A comment from Rainer Rupp.
After an exciting life, the incorrigible racist and right-wing extremist Alexander Navalny has moved on to the great beyond of tragic, neo-conservative war heroes. As fate would have it, he could not fulfill the important role that the professional US and EU warmongers had intended for him in their world-changing project to ethnically destabilize Russia. Ethnic unrest should lead to civil war-like conditions in the multi-ethnic state of Russia, with the aim of splitting the Russian Federation into many, up to 13 and possibly even more, small independent states. This would allow them all to be much better controlled and exploited by the West.
But Navalny ended the way many CIA puppets end. Because the US empire, no matter in which country, always finds people who are willing to work for the US empire in return for appropriate rewards and promises, even if it is to the detriment of their own people. And at some point this arrangement comes to a screeching, final halt, as it has now for Navalny.
As during his life, even in death, Navalny was exploited for the propaganda of his Western puppeteers: Clearly, Putin killed him. You don't even need to prove that, after all, every child knows that. And all of you in the liberal-democratic West, listen up! Navalny is such an outrageous story that you must be outraged. If not, then you are not decent democrats and may be flirting with the autocrat Putin.
And please, in view of the Russian monstrosity with Navalny, you should first forget all your other problems. Compared to Putin's crimes, these are trivial. So concentrate on the essentials, on Navalny, and forget the growing crime at home, the recommendation by German school principals to parents to only send their girls to school in groups, forget the increasing acts of violence, uncontrolled immigrant knife specialists, forget the exodus of important economic sectors with well-paid jobs, forget the explosive development of bankruptcies in small and medium-sized companies.
Forget the runaway food inflation, forget the housing shortage and unaffordable rents, forget the insane “climate rescue policies” that are destroying our farmers and our food security, forget the miserable situation in our schools, forget the growing unemployment problem, forget the growing numbers of people with jobs whose pay is not enough to cover rent and other bills. Forget all of that, because in our “best Germany of all time” these are just trivialities that we shouldn't bother with at all in view of the Russian threat in Ukraine.
Keep your mind and mind free for what really matters: namely, NAVALNY's assassination by Putin. Everyone look here, look at what is happening in Russia , look at what Putin is doing, you should all be worried, very worried, is the message from the chaos force of the traffic light government and its transatlantic, loyal opposition from the CDU/CSU and the Left.
However, dear readers and listeners, you should not forget that the ruling elites are wealthy people. They live well. They don't know the problems that concern the people. Do you still remember when Chancellor Scholz was asked on television about the approximate price per liter when discussing “skyrocketing gasoline costs?” He had to pass and he explained his ignorance by saying that his chauffeur always fills up the car.
The ruling elites worry about completely different things than you, dear readers, such as how to keep the empire running for themselves and for the super-rich they govern. They are busy ensuring that their imperial projects around the world are successful so that they can retain power, rule the entire world and impose their “rule-based international order” on it.
The neoliberal “elites” in the ruling class seem to think we, the people, are complete idiots if they think they can distract us from the real problems in our society with this cheap tour. According to the narrative of the Western lying mouths and hypocrites in politics and the media, Navalny was “a political opponent of Putin” who the Russian regime was afraid of. But the results of all surveys, including Western telephone surveys in Russia, have shown that Navalny existed as a relevant political factor in Russia only in Western propaganda. For 99 percent of Russians, he was either irrelevant or even hated because of his violent racism against Russian citizens from predominantly Muslim republics of the multi-ethnic Russian Federation. Why then is there this huge media and political push for Navalny in Germany?
If I remember correctly, Alexander Navalny was not a German citizen, nor an American one. When an opponent of the regime dies in German or especially in American prisons, which is said to happen often, not a rooster crows in Germany, Europe or the USA. No Russian diplomat accuses the German Chancellor or the US President of personally ordering a murder.
It is also a fact that the West, without knowing the slightest thing about the circumstances of Navalny's death, immediately knew for sure that it was murder and that it was Putin. All that was missing was for Putin's passport to have been found in Navalny's cell.
How would our elites react if a poor devil, for example a "rich citizen" accused of attempting a coup, died in a German prison for unknown reasons and then the entire Russian diplomacy, led by Sergei Lavrov, around the world against the German one would rush the justice system and accuse Chancellor Scholz of personally ordering the murder.
In fact, Western diplomats around the world have tried to secure a conviction for Russia in the “Navalny murder case”; but without success. India also brushed off the West in this regard and the country's foreign minister instead emphasized that they have always had good relations with Russia, continue to have them and will continue to have them in the future!
A few weeks ago, the journalist Gonzalo Lira, of Chilean and American citizenship, died in a prison run by the Ukrainian secret service SBU on January 11th of this year under circumstances that are not entirely clear. From the Ukrainian city of Kharkov, he criticized Zelensky's increasingly authoritarian policies in alternative Western forums on the Twitter and YouTube platforms, which is why he was ultimately arrested by the SBU a little less than a year ago and, according to media reports, repeatedly tortured. All attempts by his father to persuade the US embassy in Kiev to advocate for better prison conditions and his release for the US citizen Gonzalo Lira were ignored by the US side. How different Washington's reaction would have been if Gonzalo Lira had been in a Russian prison.
By the way, can you remember how German or EU politicians and media reacted to the documented systematic torture, including deaths, in the CIA prison in Abu-Guraib, Iraq? Were they at least halfway as outraged as they are now pretending to be in the Navalny case?
And there would also be a lot of outrage and excitement in view of the many political opponents of the US regime who were sentenced to death on flimsy charges based on false statements from blackmailed or paid witnesses. In the better-known cases, such as that of Mumia Abu-Jamal, a former Black Panther and journalist, or Leonard Peltier, a member of the American Indian Movement (AIM), or Sundiata Acoli, a former member of the Black Liberation Army, the death sentences were imposed converted to life imprisonment. In the USA, however, this means that they have to vegetate in American prisons until the end of their lives. These are just a few examples, and there are many other political prisoners languishing in U.S. prisons.
Only in Germany you don't have to worry about this, because there are no political prisoners here, just common criminals. The term “political prisoner” was simply defined away by the Federal German judiciary.
In the second and final part of this daily dose, we will look at excerpts from one of my previous articles on Navalny that I published on KenFM in 2021. Because Navalny did not renounce his dubious “career” as a right-wing radical and racist who preached violence until the very end. Among other things, in 2021 he openly defended his sick ideology to a British newspaper, “The Guardian” . These facts were conveniently left unmentioned in Western tributes to the dead “Russian freedom hero.”
Part 2
Navalny could only dream of a seat in the State Duma. Navalny was not unknown in Russia. The Western media had already ensured his popularity, and they suddenly became wildly interested in him after Navalny's return from the USA. This takes us back to 2010, when, through the American embassy in Moscow, the promising young Russian received a scholarship for an exclusive course at the Maurice R. Greenberg World Fellows Program , which is affiliated with the US prestigious Yale University. This alleged educational institution for international students has now been positively identified as a CIA recruiting facility.
After his return to Moscow from the USA, Navalny no longer publicly acted as a racist agitator, but as a clean-cut man who founded an organization to fight corruption with the help of generous donations. His US supporters and mentors probably made it clear to him that he could be seen as a hero in the West in his fight against corruption, but that he would have no chance as an explicit racist.
The plan worked and Navalny was portrayed in the Western media as a fearless opponent of the Putin system and its corruption. Then, in 2021, came the strange episode of Putin's alleged poisoning of the hero, his healing in a German hospital and his heroic return to Russia, followed by his sentencing to a lengthy prison sentence for a litany of criminal offenses.
Apart from the current hype, that was the last time that Navalny had to be used for a gigantic anti-Russian political and media campaign. And in this very situation, in which everyone, absolutely everyone, was called upon to demonstrate against the evil Russians because of Navalny, Amnesty International had disenchanted the “prisoner of conscience” and torn the do-gooder mask from his face. From underneath emerged a violent, racist agitator.
the poor alleged “victim” Navalny’s status as a “Prisoner of Conscience” in mid-February 2021 , i.e. a “prisoner of conscience” It began with “Amnesty International” revoking . The organization had granted this status to the Russian political bully and avowed racist Navalny a month and a half earlier because Amnesty had initially taken at face value the wild Navalny robbery pistol with the poisoning etc., which was spread by Western government propaganda as pure truth.
Interestingly, this unexpected step to disenchant Navalny came from Amnesty's regional office for Europe and Central Asia. Navalny is known as a dangerous, racist agitator, especially in the Caucasus and Central Asia. His violent videos and his irrational racial hatred are particularly directed against dark-skinned Russians from the Caucasus and people from the Islamic former Soviet republics in Central Asia, whom he described as vermin. In these countries we know what fascist spirit speaks from Navalny.
If Amnesty wanted to maintain a vestige of credibility in the Caucasus and Central Asia, the organization could no longer maintain Navalny's status as a “prisoner of conscience . ” Denis Krivoshiv, Amnesty's deputy director for Europe and Central Asia at the time, said the organization had made its "decision ... in view of comments made by Navalny in the past."
Kriwoschiv went on to say that Navalny's previous comments and his "advocacy for violence and discrimination" amounted to hate speech. Above all, Navalny never distanced himself from these comments, which contradicted Amnesty's definition of a prisoner of conscience who is imprisoned only for reasons of conscience. Next, Alexander Artemyev, Amnesty media manager for Russia and Eurasia, confirmed to Mediasona his organization's decision against Navalny and referred to his racist activities, from which he has not distanced himself to this day.
In order to make clear the “contradiction” between the noble character that Western politicians and media attribute to the “freedom hero” Navalny and the ugly reality of the right-wing extremist Navalny, here is the description and the link to a well-known Navalny video from 2007 , calling Muslims vermin who should be killed like cockroaches.
In his video , Navalny stands in front of a table in a black T-shirt. There are a slipper, a fly swatter and a pistol on it. Navalny looks into the camera. A screen can be seen to his left. A film is playing on it with pictures of beetles, cockroaches and other vermin.
Then Navalny tells the camera that the only thing that helps against “flies and cockroaches” is slippers and fly swatters . He then asks: “But what should you do if something bigger comes into the house? Like a giant cockroach?” – At that moment a huge “cockroach” appears. It is a person dressed as a cockroach wearing a black cloak. The person enters the picture with his back to the camera and walks towards Navalny. Now the video suddenly becomes pitch black: you can't see anything, then shots ring out and flashes of light can be seen.
Then it becomes light again. The human “cockroach”, now recognizable as a Muslim woman, with her face partially covered, lies shot across the table and Navalny stands next to it and points to the dead woman with the pistol in his hand and says: “That helps just the pistol. Firearms must be allowed.” Since 2021, Navalny's “cockroach” video has also been circulating in the West.
Navalny did not regret this and other videos of this kind in an interview with the British Guardian in 2017 , but continued to defend them as correct. This lack of remorse appears to have been a decisive factor in Amnesty's decision. Because a defense of Navalny with arguments common in such cases such as: “It was all a long time ago, the sins of youth, but now he is grown up and 'purified', a decent member of society ,” all of this is due to Navalny's adherence to his true fascist sentiments impossible.
There was an icy silence in the Western “quality media” about Amnesty’s revocation of Navalny’s status as a “prisoner of conscience.” Even now, the incorrigible racist and violent extremist is still honored in obituaries as the noble “Prisoner of Conscience ,” a martyr of the neoliberal world order.
NATO and EU psychological warfare experts had a lot of trouble finding a way out in 2021. At the time, keeping quiet about the racism issue and disposing of it in the memory hole seemed to be the best option. Attempts on the Internet to blame the Russian media for Amnesty International's dismantling of Navalny seemed too hollow. In addition, they did not want to arouse more public interest in the case. And the USA/NATO/EU were obviously successful in this, otherwise the political and media hype for over a week surrounding the incorrigible racist and right-wing violent extremist would have been unthinkable.
Notes and sources
[i] https://worldfellows.yale.edu/the-program/program-details/
[ii] https://zona.media/news/2021/02/23/navalhate
[iii] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVNJiO10SWw
+++
Thanks to the author for the right to publish this post.
+++
Image source: Gregory Stein / Shutterstock.com
+++
Apolut is also available as a free app for
Android and iOS devices! You can access the Apple and Huawei stores
via our homepage. Here is the link: https://apolut.net/app/
The apolut app is also available for download (as a so-called standalone or APK app) on our homepage. You can download the app to your smartphone using this link: https://apolut.net/apolut_app.apk
+++
Subscribe to the apolut newsletter now: https://apolut.net/newsletter/
+++
Do you like our program? Information about support options can be found here: https://apolut.net/unterstuetzen/
+++
Support for apolut can also be worn as clothing! Here is the link to our fan shop: https://harlekinshop.com/pages/apolut
Navalny's supporters, realizing that he had nothing to gain alive but much more to gain dead, would try to take him down again. And when it would be of most use. Now is exactly the moment. Exactly after the interview with Tucker Carlson, in the midst of the presidential election campaign in Russia and during the Munich Security Conference, where all the main anti-Russian actors, including Navalny's wife, came together very conveniently.
Mr. Rupp, I thought the bass thing was particularly successful. All attention!
There are two rumors, perhaps they are more than that, that I would like to reproduce here because they draw attention to possible aspects of Nawalni's passing:
1. Mr. Navalni is said to have had the questionable benefit of Corona gene therapy several times. It is well known that these therapies have side effects...
2. His wife (who appeared at the Munich Security Conference?) is said to have visited him in the prison camp shortly before his death. Of course, under no circumstances does this matter in his case. However, it is said that one husband made it easier for the other to enter the afterlife.
The only thing I can think of about Mr. Navalny's death is:
a Russian criminal has died. – He was probably a US agent and the “West” dreamed of getting him into the Russian presidency as a puppet – like a gentleman named Guaido in Venezuela – in order to use him to make Russia subservient to the West.
This last point (or the last two points) is where all the “theater” of the last few days comes from.
Substantial stammering from the Western criminal gang to distract from something and to further build up the inflammatory image of the Russian President.
Thanks for the article, Mr. Rupp: my picture has been added.
He was a US agent
De mortuis nil nisi bene. (One should only speak good things about the dead.)
R.i.p
The West of Values knows that every smear campaign sticks with the political opponent.
Russia is once again faced with the dead Mr. Navalnye in Russian prison
particularly bad light there.
If it wasn't the Berlin booster shot, Mr. Navalny is now serving posthumously
the values West better than he ever could alive with hatred and agitation.
Every thinking person automatically asks the question “Cui bono?”
The very very thin transparent skin,
what remains of the history-making narrative from Hollywood
Putin will definitely not solve the current problems:
June 3, 2016
Putin and the Panama Papers
The Russian President's network of relationships
https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/putin-und-die-panama-papers-das-relationsgeflecht-des-100.html
June 4, 2023
Putin's Bizarre Tsar's Village: How Russia's Elite Secretly Indulges in Luxury
https://www.merkur.de/politik/wladimir-putin-russland-toechter-ex-frau- ljudmila-zarendorf-moskau-luxusleben-ukraine-krieg- biarritz-92319316.html
The incorrect handling of Russian opposition members and their murder exacerbates the current problems:
November 23, 2016
Late satisfaction for Litvinenko's widow:
Ten years after the death of former Russian agent Alexander Litvinenko in London, the widow appeared satisfied with the British justice investigation in the DW program “Nemtsova.Interview”.
https://www.dw.com/de/mitwisser-putin-sp%C3%A4te-genugtuung-f%C3%BCr-litwinenko-witwe/a-36480771
02/22/2024
Navalny is dead: paramedic reports unusual procedure and bruises
https://www.fr.de/politik/klinik-sanitaeter-ukraine-krieg-news-nawalnys-tot-russland-putin-klinik-92839850.html
But Navalny wasn't such an easy case either:
February 16, 2024
Feared and banned by the Kremlin
The Anti-Putin Network: The Partisans of Alexei Navalny
https://www.rnd.de/politik/alexej-nawalny-und-das-anti-putin-netzwerk- vom-kreml-in-moskau-gefuerchtet-5ISDZQNWP5DPFGAABSX6WSYCLE.html
02/23/2024
“Sudden death syndrome”: Russia is making new plans with Navalny’s body
https://www.fr.de/politik/mutter-putin-aktuell-leiche-probe-nawalny-tod-russland-92842593.html
today's date
Navalny's mother was allowed to see the body and speaks of "blackmail" - new details about the cause of death
https://www.merkur.de/politik/gehen-mutter-hat-nawalnys-leiche-zr-92848996.html
The murder of Russian opposition members also existed before Mr. Putin.
We could, for example, deal with the deep state in the USA:
Dr. Steven Greer : CIA Director Murdered by Majestic-12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvTkTpDhFMg
Dr. Steven Greer | The Brutal Truth About Our Government | Clips 01 | Ep. 185
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gl8Uo01oDB8
MJ12
https://archive.org/stream/majiall337/ ciaUfosMj-12JfkAndJamesJesusAngletonAsTheCiasCounterintelligenceChiefJamesJesusAngletonHadAccessToTheAgenciesMostCloselyGuardedSecretsIncludingMj-12FilesOnUfos._djvu.txt
The death of James Forrestal
http://www.archiv.mufon-ces.org/text/deutsch/dolan6.htm
@ Ralle002:
... and now that I have listed the articles and headlines written by the MSM, what should I think of your comment?
What are you trying to tell me? I do not get it.
Anna Lyse
I agree with Rainer Rupp that Navalny's proximity to the CIA didn't make things any easier.
On the other hand, Rainer Rupp is not concerned with the democratic deficits in Russia, for which Mr. Putin is primarily responsible. Would Mr. Navalny have had better options to defend himself against the repression of the Russian government?
Christian Ehring is to be praised for the following Extra3 contribution:
Vladimir Putin: From KGB crook to crook president
https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/extra-3/wladimir-putin-vom-kgb- ganoven-zum-ganoven-praesidenten/das-erste/ Y3JpZDovL25kci5kZS82M2NjNzBiNC02NGVkLTQ4YjctOTc2YS03ZmVkNWU1OGRkMDM
What should we actually think of Rainer Rupp?
Rainer Rupp
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainer_Rupp
08. September 2011
The Star Wars
Markus Kompa
https://www.telepolis.de/features/Der-krieg-der- Sternen-3391066.html
The MSM very often leave out things like "Majestic 12".
The fact that I quoted mainstream media (MSM) is too imprecise as an objection to my links.
You write about democracy deficits in Russia. Take a look at your own front door. The term democracy has become as inflationary as fiat money. It can mean anything and nothing. I assume you mean the EU with its jumping jacks and women, cough...
@Ralle002
"On the other hand, Rainer Rupp is not concerned with the democratic deficits in Russia, for which Mr. Putin is primarily responsible."
Now it would be very interesting to know WHICH real “democratic deficits” YOU are talking about? Do you have your own experiences or are these “perceived deficits claimed by Western MSM”?
Apart from the fact that Germany is everything but NOT a democracy in the true sense of the word!
You should clean yourself and your own mental hygiene as well as clean your own world of thoughts!
“Would Mr. Navalny have had better opportunities to defend himself against the repression of the Russian government?”
What REAL repressions are YOU talking about? Even just from the inoculated Western “repressions”?
Here are a few excerpts to find out how criminal Navalny actually was & how generous the Russian justice system treated him & I would recommend reading the entire interview... because it actually has a lot of information that is certainly unknown to the German rank and file:
Jaques Baude wrote something about the “actual history of Navalny”, which is very interesting!
https://publikumsconference.de/blog/alexei-nawalny-die-tatsachliche-geschichte/
"TP: He has a long criminal record, is a convicted felon and is in prison. Which political faction, if any, does Navalny represent on the Russian political scene?
JB: Politically, his image is not very rosy. In 2007 he was expelled from the center-right Yabloko party because of his regular participation in the ultra-nationalist “Russian March” and his “nationalist activities” (12) with racist tendencies. He is an activist for ultranationalist causes. At that time, he made a video in which he eloquently imitated the shooting of Chechen migrants in Russia."
…..
"Navalny began his career in the 2000s as an entrepreneur. Following a common practice in Boris Yeltsin's Russia between 1990 and 2000, he bought up companies in order to privatize their profits (an illegal practice that led to Vladimir Putin violating certain ones oligarchs who eventually sought refuge in Britain or Israel). In the first case (Kirovles), Navalny received a five-year suspended sentence.
However, the most “controversial” case is that of the French cosmetics house Yves Rocher. It's a relatively complex matter involving a tangle of companies and accounts, some of them overseas. The best description of the case can be found in the press release by Yves Rocher (23) and on Wikipedia (in Russian, 24). In short, this is a case of embezzlement through abuse of power pitting the Russian state against Oleg Navalny.
In 2008, Oleg Navalny, Alexei's brother, was a manager at the Russian Post's automated sorting center in Podolsk. To facilitate the delivery of Yves Rocher products to the sorting center, he urged the French company to use the services of a private logistics company: Glavpodpiska (GPA), owned by the Navalny family. There is clearly a conflict of interest and corruption situation that has led to an official investigation. It should be noted that Oleg Navalny is the main defendant, while Alexei Navalny is “only” an accomplice. For this reason, Oleg was sentenced to three and a half years in prison and Navalny was given a three and a half year suspended sentence.
Oleg and Alexei Navalny appealed this decision to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), arguing that the ruling was politically motivated. Contrary to the assertion of some Western media (25), the ECtHR did not invalidate this judgment because it assessed not the content of the case but its form. On October 17, 2017, the ECtHR issued its judgment in which it partially found the two brothers correct on certain legal issues and concluded that the Russian judicial system should pay them compensation. However, it rejected the allegation that her conviction was politically motivated (paragraph 89) (26).
In fact, after being indicted in the case against the French company “Yves Rocher”, Navalny was placed on probation, according to which he had to report to the Russian correctional service twice a month until the end of this period (December 30, 2020).
Navalny's failure to comply with this obligation led to his arrest in early 2021. He had already violated this order six times in 2020 (twice in January, once in February, March, July and August), but the Russian authorities had shown leniency at the time. As the Swiss television correspondent in Moscow notes (27), Navalny “unlike many other opposition figures, was never sentenced to prison.” So, despite his many offenses and contrary to claims in the West, Navalny has benefited from unusual leniency. So much so that some (conspiracy theorists) in Russia believe he is being used by the Kremlin to weaken the main opposition parties.
To claim that the lifting of his suspension was politically motivated, some argue that Navalny was physically unable to fulfill his obligations. France 24 explained (28) that he was unable to do so “because he was simply in hospital in Germany”. France 5 stated (29) that “he was in a coma” and Swiss television (RTS) that “he was recovering in Germany after his poisoning” (30). These are simply lies.
In fact, his obligation to report was suspended by the Russian authorities for the duration of his hospital stay at the Charité in Berlin. The report from the doctors at the Charité Hospital published on December 22, 2020 confirmed (31) that he was discharged from the hospital on September 23, 2020 and that his symptoms had disappeared on October 12, 2020 (32).
On December 28, Russian prison authorities sent Navalny a warning (copied to his lawyer and press secretary) to report for duty, but he ignored it (33).
In fact, Navalny has been busy since September with the final stages of editing his film about Putin's palace. For this reason, he would not be able to return to Russia until the end of January 2021. The Russian penal authorities could hardly have ignored this new offense of almost three months and revoked his suspended sentence. Navalny undoubtedly hoped to benefit once again from the authorities' leniency. But given the airing of his film and his calls for sanctions against Russia, this was probably a rather naive assumption on his part...
Even if the Russian authorities had – once again – wanted to show leniency towards him under these circumstances, this would have been completely incomprehensible to Russian public opinion.
TP: The documentary portrays him as a serious threat to Putin. Is there something these documentarians know that leads them to this conclusion?
JB: No, Aleksey Navalny is neither the main opponent nor the most important or even the most dangerous opponent of Putin in Russia - he is simply the most visible (34). It has only a marginal importance in Russian politics.
Navalny has embraced the concept of “smart voting” or “tactical voting” to win votes from the extreme parties of both the right and the left. In other words, those who individually are not numerous enough to put forward candidates in the elections. The principle of Navalny's “smart voting” is that everyone receives their ballot, unless you are a member of the United Russia party (Vladimir Putin's party). So it works according to a logic based not on preference but on hate...
The opposition associated with him is anything but democratic and united. It brings together different factions of the extra-parliamentary opposition, ranging from the extreme right to the former Stalinist Communist Party.
These are individuals who are against the system but have neither a common vision nor a program for the future of the country. It is also a young opposition that is informed via social networks and is relatively unstable. Essentially an opposition that wants to overthrow Vladimir Putin without being able to offer an alternative. This explains why this heterogeneous opposition has very low support in Russia. Navalny's electoral strategy shows that he has no plans for Russia and that the goal here is not to achieve what is best for Russia, but to destabilize the current government. And that's why the West supports Navalny."
Yes, I had it today at the checkout of E…. laughing while paying for my 50% meat (free bonus). The former news magazine with Putin on the cover, 'The Power of Putin' and the star with this A…….. N……. The guy is in prison for fraud, ignored the conditions regarding his stay etc. before his sentencing, the same as Assange, but Ru is not UK, they didn't put him in high security torture, they let him run around freely and cause trouble. I heard that he was vaccinated several times, Western perhaps?
https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2021-05/amnesty-international-alexej-nawalny-violent-loser-political-prisoner-approval
Unimportant, otherwise final disposal by his handlers, I said straight away.
"We [the US] tried to put lipstick on this pig..."
Scott Ritter
https://de.rt.com/kurzclips/video/197172-scott-ritter-nawalny-war-von-der-cia-trainierte-unruhestifter-um-putin-zu-zu-tuerzen/
A very readable article by Rainer Rupp, who I greatly appreciate. In the first part, the author, emotionally committed, points out the enormous distraction function of the Navalny theater; in the second part, using the particularly evidential (linked) sources, he once again demonstrates in a critically informative manner the disenchantment of those who have been inflated by the media to be the "hero of freedom". US-sponsored PR puppet. What's exciting is that the West, which used Navalny as a PR puppet in its anti-Russian inflammatory propaganda, had a problem with Navalny at some point when his violence-glorifying racism became too blatant to allow him to disappear into the famous hole of silence in the media. The instrumentalization of the PR puppet increasingly threatened to bring about undesirable boomerang effects.
The first part of the article, which sums up the general criticism of the diversionary play "Navalny" with great verve and emotional commitment, should meet with our unreserved approval, but I find the second part more interesting, as some background information is also presented here. which – at least for me – are/were new.
This article deserves a place of honor in the sewing box of enlightenment, as it makes it very illuminating to understand the strategic methods US secret services use to breed and train their undercover activists in "enemy territory", so Rainer Rupp's explanations are an exemplary example of something like this how to work out the standardized pattern of a career of purchased opposition dolls: US embassy arranges scholarship in the USA; the mental fit is processed there; the puppet then returns to its "homeland"; is active as an activist of the rabid, polemical, tendentially criminal style (although the previous recruitment measures in the USA and the financial sources still gushing from there remain clandestine). Then in Western media the puppet is stylized as a hero of freedom who, like Jesus, suffers great injustice for humanity. However, if the puppet behaves in an uncouth manner and displays its rabid racism too loudly, media filtering and censorship measures must be used to ensure that the externally controlled opposition puppet does not tarnish its PR image too badly.
These recruitment procedures can now also be found in very similar versions in the production of young leaders, who are formed according to recipes from the plutocratic Round Table on the Swiss Olympus.
Once you become aware of this modern type of cadre forge by opposition and government puppets, you also understand the network forms of current power structures, which in fact have features of real-existing conspiracies and can therefore be characterized in part structurally as paranoia that has become objective. That's why the notorious weapon of the counter-enlighteners, with which they fight the investigation of these plutocratic networks, is the club once developed by the CIA (against doubters of the one-perpetrator theory of the Kennedy assassination) of the accusation that it is about the elucidation of power elite networks around “conspiracy theories”.
With kind regards and my thanks to Rainer Rupp for his tireless educational work
That would be such a good and accurate comment if the author hadn't gotten away with it again and given himself these rarely stupid common-law sayings like "knife specialists". If I wanted to make some misguided people on the left of center think with this comment, the answer would immediately come up: "He himself dismisses right-wing insults and bullies against the right? Unbelievable."
Of course, "the great cockroach critic and pest expert" Navalny was exactly what the author so aptly describes: a right-wing extremist piece *****, who is now considered the great one out of all sorts of parliamentary political actors only because of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." hero is placed there and people fantasize and hagiograph that the beams bend. But if you want to expect from the class enemy - I wouldn't be surprised if I had to read in the taz or in the mirror at some point: "Leading historians are rethinking: was the great critic of communism and Judaism and animal lover A.Hitler defeated by the cruel and inhuman dictator J "Stalin was driven to suicide?"
Ultimately, EVERY lie will be exposed. Because a lie can only be strengthened by more lies, the truth speaks for itself.